Andrew Trembley (bovil) wrote,
Andrew Trembley


(OK, I know this isn't twitter, but I like this hashtag-fail construct)

So, if you haven't heard yet, the DOJ has filed its brief defending DOMA in Smelt v the United States of America.

There's been a lot of screaming about it, and for good reason. It's a horrible brief.

The Justice Department claims it has to defend the law, but that's overstatement at best.

Andrew Sullivan points out that the brief was written and submitted by a Bush-administration hold-over recognized by Alberto Gonzalez for his defense of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.

So, yeah.

I would have preferred the administration to decide that there were aspects of the law that were unconstitutional and choose to not defend it on those grounds.

I would have preferred the administration had already started on the legislative action to repeal DOMA that was promised during the campaign.

But, frankly, at the moment, I would have been satisfied if the Justice Department had maybe reviewed the brief before it was submitted, and not submitted such an inflammatory brief.

In the end, though, this may be a snow job on all of us: what if the Obama administration picked an attorney they knew would submit the most repugnant defense of the law possible to set up the defense to lose? It would be consistent with the Obama that the conservative pundits keep painting, and in some ways the meandering brief is practically a gift to the plaintiffs' attorney.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded